New York Mets

Print Share


Who’s on Second?

According to Abbott and Costello, “Who’s on first, What’s on second, and I Don’t Know’s on third.”

However, for the 2011 New York Mets, the question will be the following: who (not what) is on second?

Let’s be honest. Even before his recent injury, Met fans were not getting excited about the prospects of having Luis Hernandez man second base for us next year.

If you look right now at the Mets’ 2011 roster, the starting nine appear all but certain, barring any major changes (which we no doubt may see).

Davis at first, Reyes at short, Wright at third, Thole behind the dish, Bay (if healthy) in left, and some combination of Beltran and Pagan in center and right. That leaves only second base.

I’m guessing that Luis Castillo already has his luggage packed for the inevitable call that informs him that he is no longer a Met. Luis had a terrific career as a Marlin (two-time World Series champion and a 35-game hitting streak). But his time as a Met was marred by injury, lack of production, and of course this.

(On second thought, I apologize for including that, but sadly when we think back on Luis Castillo’s Mets career, that play sums it up.)

So who will play second base for the Mets in 2011? Here are some options.

In his time with the big club, Ruben Tejada has shown that he is a magician with the glove. His up-the-middle defense (whether at second or short) has undoubtedly saved the Mets a few losses this season. He struggled at the plate but showed immense improvement over the few games before his recent injury.

The question with Tejada will be can he hold his own offensively so that the Mets can benefit from his defense. He’s like Rey Ordonez (but maybe not as much range as Rey-O). He would bat eighth in the order and would not be considered a run-producer. However, if the Mets continue their offensive struggles into next season, Tejada may find that he doesn’t have many chances to drive in runs and must be clutch in those situations. If he’s not, he may wind up back in the minors.

Daniel Murphy at second brings up an interesting argument. Sadly, his season was cut short on a dirty slide by an opposing player while Murph was trying to turn two as a second baseman. It’s definitely a work in progress.

We know one thing: Murphy can hit. He led the Mets in home runs last year, albeit with only 12 (thanks for that Citi Field). However, he was misused in the Mets lineup. He is not a #4 hitter which is where Jerry Manuel often hit him due to the lack of offensive weapons. He would be a great six or seven hitter for this team.

If the Mets are willing to sacrifice defense for offense, Murphy was have a shot. It seems though that the Mets envision Murph as a super-utility guy who can play anywhere and spell anyone of any given day.

If the Mets really want to sacrifice defense for offense, they’ll make a trade for Dan Uggla of the Marlins. Uggla will always be remembered for committing three errors in the 2008 All-Star Game.

However, what people should be remembering about Uggla is that he recently Became the first second baseman in the history of the game the record four straight 30-HR seasons. That is an impressive feat.

Uggla would provide some much needed pop on a team that has suffered from a dearth of home runs that past two seasons. The cavernous gaps of Citi Field still would be no match for Uggla’s power. But once again, defense is key.

The one man available who would solve the problems with no strings attached would be Orlando Hudson. And how convenient, he is a free agent at the end of this season.

Hudson is a four-time Gold Glover and has a respectable .281 career batting average. He’s had a rough go of it this season in Minnesota, and a change of scenery may benefit him.

That being said, he made $5 million this season. He may not command as much after his year but still would be looking for something in the $3-4 million dollar range. That should be within the Mets price range.

Hudson seems to be the most obvious choice, but then again he will be 33 next year so he may be on the decline. If this year is any indication, he is already on the decline.

Those four appear to be the most viable choices at this point. The Mets may further explore both the trade and free agent market but most likely due to financial constraints will be limited in what they can do.

If Tejada can provide some consistent offense, he would be my choice to start at second. His defense is so valuable, and for a pitching staff that doesn’t overpower hitters, defense wins games.

I’m not saying Tejada has to all of a sudden turn into Jeff Kent (not only did the Mets trade David Cone to acquire Kent, but they then traded away Kent, the all-time leader in HR among second basemen, for Carlos Baerga; great job front office!).

But if he can hit in the neighborhood of .240-.260 with a few homers and drive in some clutch runs, he will see the field often and be a vital part of the Mets’ success in 2011.

About the Author Subscribe to author's RSS feed
Written by
James (Jim) Mancari hails from Massapequa, NY. He graduated from the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg, VA with degrees in History and Kinesiology. Jim currently is pursuing a Master's degree in Journalism at Hofstra University (Hempstead, NY). He is a devout Mets fan and takes pride in his team, despite their lack of success over the last few years. Like all Mets' fans, Jim has plenty of hope. Jim also writes for the NJ Nets on this site. He can be contacted at He appreciates and respects additional opinions.

Tags , , , , , , ,


In response to “Who’s on Second?”

  1. Franny Berkman Sep 21 20101:43 am


    Very thorough synopsis of the situation. For my money, I guess I’m hoping for Hudson. Mets fans (specifically Joe Benigno) have been acting like he will be some kind of savior which I don’t buy. However, I’ve heard he is a great club house guy which is something the Mets could really use. Wright could afford to have a proven veteran to help him lead this bunch, and hopefully Hudson could be the guy to finally bring some positive vibes and team chemistry to the Mets. I’d be interested to hear your thoughts on the managerial situation.

    Your old buddy,

    1. Jim Mancari Sep 21 20108:28 am


      Hey Fran, good to hear from you. Thanks for reading. I like your take on the issue. The O-Dog is a proven vet. He’s has a tough year this year but ods are he’ll bounce back. The Mets desperately need a clubhouse presence. Francouer was great in the clubhouse, but when you hit .230, that limits your credibility to be a leader. I’ll be holding off on a managerial article til the end of the season. I have definitely been giving it some thought. Take care.

      1. Franny Berkman Sep 22 20101:46 am


        Yup you can’t have .230 hitters and back up infielders (Alex Cora) be your team leaders. Hell even great pitchers generally aren’t team leaders. You need your best everyday players to be the guys to set the tone in the clubhouse. These are the types of guys who after a loss can stand up and say sure we didn’t get it done tonight, but we will tomorrow. That takes a lot of pressure off the lesser players on the team. Go down the line with championship teams and that’s what they have the vast majority of the time. Look at the Yankees with Jeter and Posada and the Phillies with Howard, Utley and Rollins.

        As for the manager situation I have been thinking about it a lot as well, but I’ll wait for you to write your piece on it and then I’ll reply to that.

        1. Jim Mancari Sep 22 20108:32 am


          Santana would be a great team leader, but like you said, playing once every five days isn’t going to cut it.

  2. Christopher Rowe Sep 21 201010:35 am


    As a fellow writer, I appreciate your thorough breakdown of the situation. Uggla is an interesting thought as is Hudson but the issue of offense vs. defense is ultimately what will be the mitigating factor. As a Hofstra alum (and fellow writer) I’m glad to see you pursuing journalism. However, I’m a Phillies fan so my heart tells me that I’d like to see the Mets remain as dysfunctional as they have become in recent years!! Sorry just being honest.

    If “What” is not available to play second then I think that Hudson or Uggla would be a huge improvement over Murphy (who as you say would make an excellent utility man). Is it really true that the Mets are not looking to make any other changes in 2011 save second base?

    1. Jim Mancari Sep 21 201010:44 am


      Christopher, thanks for reading and Go Pride!

      Unless they decide to make drastic changes, where can they add another player? The infield besides second seems set, and they have a ton of money invested in Beltran and Bay. Catcher, maybe, but the organization has liked what they’ve seen from Thole.

      I’m curious, you said you were a writer, what is subject matter? Did you attend Hofstra for journalism?

      1. Christopher Rowe Sep 21 20104:30 pm



        I attended Hofstra as an undergrad where I studied communications, media and film production. Screenwriting and journalism are of course part of the program but most of my success has come on my own (covered the Jets when they spent training camp there, did a huge article on the legend of Wayne Chrebet) but this was in the early to mid-1990s. Hofstra offers an excellent general program to give one the tools to get started. I’m sure that the graduate program is even better!

        As for your Mets… (tempered by the fact that I’m a Phillies fan) the fewer changes they wish to make the happier I am. That being said, they’re only 10 games off the pace of the division and who knows what will happen with Atlanta next year? Mets will be back but I’m still revelling in their 2007 collapse (7 games up with 17 to play). I do like it when the Phils & Mets are contenders at the same time. This rivalry is good for both teams. Atlanta is just not a true rival, Florida is pesky (at best) and the Woeful Washington Nationals are a AAA team at best.

        Go Pride (formerly Flying Dutchmen)!!!!

Add Your Comment